Aero chronicle of the ACI Rally Monza 2020

The weird 2020 season reached its end yesterday with the last stages of the ACI Rally Monza. It’s time to congratulate all (drivers, teams, organizers, press and FIA) for keeping the Championship alive under so difficult conditions. And it’s also time to review the most relevant aero details seen on the event before a new series of pre-season tests starts in a few days.

M-Sport decided it was time to evaluate in competition the latest aero modifications at the front of the Ford Fiesta WRC, homologated on October 1st. For this purpose, they decided to install them only in the car of Teemu Suninen/Jarmo Lehtinen. The reason behind this decision could be to benchmark it with the original aero, still mounted in Lappi/Ferm car. Or because this duo will not continue with the team in 2021, as Lappi suggested at the end of the Rally Monza power stage.

T.Suninen/J.Lehtinen, Ford Fiesta WRC, ACI Rally Monza 2020, ret. – picture by ACI Rally Monza

The modifications introduced, as we already reviewed in a previous article, consisted of the addition of small endplates at the outer side of the dive planes (see yellow arrows in the picture below), as well as the modification of the upper surface f the front fender, which is now wing-shaped (blue arrow). They have all been designed to increase downforce, especially (but not only) at the car front, in order to increase grip, thus reducing understeering.

T.Suninen/J.Lehtinen, Ford Fiesta WRC, ACI Rally Monza 2020, ret. – picture by ACI Rally Monza

Unfortunately, the early retirement of Suninen/Lehtinen due to engine problems did not allow them to draw conclusions about these modifications, so we will have to wait until the 2021 season starter event.

As usual in gravel events, the Toyota Yaris WRC included rim covers to prevent mud accumulation that might damage or block the bolts. The novelty was, for the Monza event, the use of bigger, grey covers, which were seen since the pre-event test held the week before.  Also during the rally, the new covers were used in most of the stages.

K.Rovanperä/J.Holttunen, Toyota Yaris WRC, ACI Rally Monza 2020, 4th – picture by FIA WRC

But they were not used in all stages by all drivers, as in some stages the usual (smaller and white) covers were used (see picture below).

S.Ogier/J.Ingrassia, Toyota Yaris WRC, ACI Rally Monza 2020, 1st – picture by Toyota Gazoo Racing WRC

New (left) and usual (right) rim covers in the Toyota Yaris WRC at the 2020 ACI Rally Monza

The main use of rim covers is to protect the wheel bolts from mud/dust accumulation and stone impacts. They have also an additional aero effect: they allow a smoother airflow over the wheel, thus reducing the drag. But the benefits are very small, and teams only use them on gravel events, but usually not on tarmac.

E.Evans/S.Martin, Toyota Yaris WRC, ACI Rally Monza 2020, 29th – picture by Toyota Gazoo Racing WRC

Even though the Monza event was held in muddy and even snowy conditions, the four Yaris WRC used the usual rear fender vents, instead of the modified designs the team had used under these conditions such as in Sweden, Estonia or Turkey.

K.Rovanperä/J.Holttunen, Toyota Yaris WRC, ACI Rally Monza 2020, 4th – picture by ACI Rally Monza

In spite of the difficult conditions, the reliability of the aero parts was good enough in Monza. The worst part was for the duo Rovanperä/Holtunnen, who had a short off at the SS7 Selvino 1. The result was the loss of the front right dive planes and part of the front fender, that left the tire exposed to the main flow. The impact on the car performance was huge: due to the loss of the dive planes, less downforce was generated at the front and, most importantly, on all the right side of the car.

The explanation is that the dive planes (also known as canards) generate a row of small vortices that flow along the side of the car, protecting the undercar from the entrance of external air. The smaller the amount of air flowing under the car means the lower the pressure. Thus, the dive planes contribute to keeping the low pressure under the car… when they are present. Their loss resulted in a different pressure on both sides of the car, and the final consequence was an unbalanced car (as the driver confirmed at the end of the stage interview). Also, the impact of the main airflow over the rotating wheel had an adverse effect due to the increase in air resistance (drag), which surely contributed to slow down the car (as the timesheets confirmed).

T.Katsuta/D.Barritt, Toyota Yaris WRC, ACI Rally Monza 2020, 20th – picture extracted from WRC.com images

Good news for Takamoto Katsuta and Daniel Barritt for the ACI Rally Monza, where they could drive the latest evolution of the Toyota Yaris WRC, with the latest design of the rear brake cooling air intakes. And they proved to deserved it, by setting their first fastest time in a WRC stage in the power stage, as well as some very interesting results in other stages, in spite of the conditions and the tight competition between the titles’ contenders.

The ACI Rally Monza was the first WRC event where the Hyundai i20 Coupé WRC mounted the new front grill protection that we had already seen in the Rallye Ypres pre-event tests and in the Kehala Rally. The protection used in Monza during the first leg (Thursday/Friday) partially protected the front grill, leaving the upper space free. Also, due to the low temperatures, a blocking plate was included on the right side of the front grill, in order not to reduce the engine cooling fluid below the appropriate working range, which might have damaged the engine.

T.Neuville/N.Gilsoul, Hyundai i20 Coupé WRC, ACI Rally Monza 2020 (Friday), ret. – picture by ACI Rally Monza

For the Saturday stages, the front grill protection was removed.

D.Sordo/C.Del Barrio, Hyundai i20 Coupé WRC, ACI Rally Monza 2020 (Saturday), 3rd – picture by ACI Rally Monza

Also, on Sunday stages the grill protection was discarded, while the blocking plate was still used… except on SS15 Serraglio 1 (picture below), where Tänak/Järveoja possibly lost it.

O.Tänak/M.Järveoja, Hyundai i20 Coupé WRC, ACI Rally Monza 2020 (Sunday), 2nd – picture by ACI Rally Monza

These were some of the aero issues in the last event of the season. But there is no time to relax, as the pre-season test will surely start soon, and, as always, with plenty of aero novelties that we will continue to review.

And not only for the new Rally1 category but also for Rally2 and the rest.  In the meantime, this is our recognition to the 2020 R5 winners.

M.Østberg/T.Eriksen, Citroën C3 R5, ACI Rally Monza 2020, 1st WRC2 – picture by FIA WRC

J.Huttunen/M.Lukka, Hyundai i20 R5, ACI Rally Monza 2020, 3rd WRC3 – picture by Honza Froněk – ewrc-results.com

P.Tidemand/P. Barth, Toksport Škoda Fabia Evo R5, ACI Rally Monza 2020, 2nd WRC2 – picture by ACI Rally Monza

7 thoughts on “Aero chronicle of the ACI Rally Monza 2020

  • 2020-12-07 at 10:53
    Permalink

    Happy to see you at the end of this weird season. A few technical questions, as usual:

    1. Because Toyota has started to play with their wheel rims, will we see some more extreme solutions like we see in F1 & professional cycling in the past? Because, other than drag reduction, the cover can also be shaped to channel strong air through the car’s sides and create a pseudo-skirt around the floor. I think this can theoretically be paired with a more aggressive diffuser design in asphalt and consistent gravel stages, don’t you think?
    2. I haven’t yet commented on the Hyundai Rally2 post, so I’ll do it here: Paddon has incorporated some novelties in his car, most strikingly the removal of the air scoop. This has got me thinking: Why haven’t the teams use NACA duct (like F1) on the roof instead? It’s a depression on the skin, so very little drag, and is able to be made wider to let the same amount of airflow through to the cabin.
    3. I wonder why we haven’t seen more aggressive blown diffuser designs, especially from Toyota who have a lot of experience in this area in their other areas of competition. Do you think it’s simply not possible within the rules’ box?

    Reply
    • 2020-12-07 at 21:17
      Permalink

      Great comments, as usual, Kevin, thanks a lot! These are our thoughts about them:
      1. We doubt they go so far. The skirt effect is currently done by the dive planes, and they don’t care too much about the aero benefits of the covers. Otherwise, they would also use them on tarmac, and they don’t.
      2. Also, the use of a NACA duct would be ideal…but we’re not sure if it is possible by regulation. In any case, they could start with something similar to what Paddon’s car proposed.
      3. The rear diffuser is an area of potential improvement for all teams, and we will probably see some modifications in the next months. But most of the current efforts are oriented to increase the downforce at the car front, where there’s still a deficit. Any improvement at the rear would make the car more unbalanced.
      Cheers, Lluis

      Reply
      • 2020-12-08 at 10:22
        Permalink

        Thanks a lot! Also, I forgot to put in this question, so I hope you don’t mind one more: Did the snow tires Lappi used in the wet stages have the same tread pattern as the studded Finland ones, or is it more similar to the wets? I’m not too clear because it’s rarely used as well as my media not showing it clearly. Additionally, I find it frustrating Michelin doesn’t supply us fans with more direct and clearer stats, instead of relying on the broadcast to do so (even though they’re usually very good commentaries).

        Reply
        • 2020-12-08 at 18:16
          Permalink

          Thanks, we are open to all questions…but tires are far from our knowledge. The non-studded tire pattern looks different from that of the rain tire, according to the Michelin images posted during the weekend. But, for the studded tires used in Sweden, you should check the Michelin website. And, as far as I have seen, Michelin used to provide good info through tweeter about the tires used before most of the stages. What they could no say was the mounting selected by each driver, but this info is usually provided graphically through wrc.com images.

          Reply
          • 2020-12-09 at 13:48
            Permalink

            Thanks. Cheers!

  • 2020-12-07 at 16:46
    Permalink

    Great work as always. We rely on you guys. Keep it up.

    Reply
    • 2020-12-07 at 21:08
      Permalink

      Thank you, Lawrence, your words are music to us!

      Reply

Leave a Reply to Kevin Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *